The Rapidian

GRPD rifle purchase splits Commissioners, residents

On December 15, the Grand Rapids City Commission approved the purchase of 65 rifles for the GRPD.
Though the Commission meeting was packed at the beginning of the evening, by hour three, crowds had thinned.

Though the Commission meeting was packed at the beginning of the evening, by hour three, crowds had thinned. /by Nick Nortier

The Grand Rapids City Commission voted in favor of a plan to allow the Grand Rapids Police Department (GRPD) to acquire new rifles on December 15, in a split vote of 5-2. The decision sparked a debate, with mixed responses from attendees of the City Commission meeting and Grand Rapids residents over the role of guns in maintaining safety in Grand Rapids.

The City Commission authorized the city to spend $69,000 on 65 Colt .223 caliber rifles for 59 Grand Rapids police vehicles and an additional $230,000 on ammunition for usage during police training exercises. The distribution of rifles is scheduled to take place during the fall of 2016. Prior to the distribution, the GRPD will require each of its officers to fire 1,000 rounds during 32 hours of rifle training.

Amid the debate between gun advocates and critics over how to improve safety in Grand Rapids, violent crime in Grand Rapids has fallen to a 50 year low. In an average year, 15 people are murdered in Grand Rapids. Last year, six murders occurred within city limits, none of which occurred due to gun usage.

Proponents of the rifle purchase maintain that the GRPD is long past due for an upgrade in weaponry. According to Police Chief David Rahinsky, rifles offer police officers greater accuracy than the handguns and shotguns that are currently available, and are necessary to combat the firepower available on the street. 

Third Ward City Commissioner Senita Lenear disagreed with Rahinsky’s assessment. During the city commission meeting, Lenear stated that she had requested a public forum to be held on the rifle purchase seven months earlier “to no avail.”

“Pause. Engage the community,” said Lenear. “People are concerned that the rifles will be used in communities in color to over police and to harass them.”

The GRPD plans to host four meetings regarding the rifle purchase in January 2016. Rahinsky maintains that the upcoming meetings and six-month training period will give them sufficient time to discuss concerns regarding the rifle purchase with Grand Rapids residents.

Lenear also expressed concern that the rifle distribution would occur before the completion of the GRPD 12-point plan. The GRPD 12-point plan, which was developed with the input of Grand Rapids residents, community groups, the City Commission and members of the GRPD in January, called for the implementation of body cameras, additional community engagement activities and implicit racial bias and profiling training for all officers.

By July, the GRPD put eight of the twelve recommendations in place, including the purchase of body cameras. However, the GRPD missed the December deadline for four of the recommendations, including the implicit racial bias training.

Members of various community groups went further than Commissioner Lenear, calling for the City Commission to postpone the rifle decision for one year during the public comments section of Tuesday’s meeting. 

"The purchase of rifles will not improve transparency,” said Jeremy DeRoo, Co-Director of LINC, a local advocacy group, who argued that more time was needed to foster dialogue between the community and police.

Ken Miguel-Cipriano, a member of Equity Drinks, a social network focused on advancing diversity and inclusion in Grand Rapids, made the case that Grand Rapids’ violent crime rate has decreased and that the introduction of rifles could increase community fears of police militarization and even lead to a spike in violent crime.

Local tension over the rifle decision reflects growing national tension over gun safety in the U.S. After the recent mass shooting of 14 people in San Bernardino, California by a couple inspired by the Islamic-extremist group ISIS, police departments and politicians across the country are considering measures to ramp up armament measures to defend against further violent acts.

In an interview following the city commission meeting, Equity Drinks founder Jeremy Moore questioned the efficacy of armament measures.

“I don't believe there is any evidence that increased armament on the part of police combat mass shootings. I understand why police want them. We see mass shootings. Police want accurate weapons. They want to go home to their families. I get it,” he said. But Moore called for increased gun control to prevent violence in cities. “Countries like Australia have shown clear models of how specific, common-sense gun control measures greatly reduce mass shootings. What if police actually advocated for these same measures?”

The Rapidian, a program of the 501(c)3 nonprofit Community Media Center, relies on the community’s support to help cover the cost of training reporters and publishing content.

We need your help.

If each of our readers and content creators who values this community platform help support its creation and maintenance, The Rapidian can continue to educate and facilitate a conversation around issues for years to come.

Please support The Rapidian and make a contribution today.

Comments, like all content, are held to The Rapidian standards of civility and open identity as outlined in our Terms of Use and Values Statement. We reserve the right to remove any content that does not hold to these standards.

Browse